Gainesville Logo
 
File #: 100224.    Version: Name: Commissioner Thomas Hawkins - Bicycle Stop Ordinance (NB)
Type: Staff Recommendation Status: Passed
File created: 2/17/2011 In control: Public Safety Committee
On agenda: Final action: 2/17/2011
Title: Bicycle Yield /Stop Ordinance (NB)
Attachments: 1. 100224_cthawkins_20100805.pdf, 2. 100224_WhyBicycHateStopSigns_20101129.pdf, 3. 100224_BicycleLawWording_20101129.pdf, 4. 100224_BikeYieldatStop-20101129.doc
Title
Bicycle Yield /Stop Ordinance (NB)
 
Explanation
This item involves Public Safety Committee review of a proposal for city consideration of a bicycle yield/stop ordinance allowing cyclist to yield rather than stop at stop signs.
 
Information points:
-Idaho is the only state to have approved a state law to allow bicyclists to yield at stop signs.
-Idaho has had this legislation for 27 years and has not seen much change in bicycle crash/fatality statistics.
-A few years ago Idaho also passed a law allowing cyclists to treat a red light as a stop sign after stopping and checking that no traffic is present.
-California and Oregon were unsuccessful at changing their state law, however, advocates are continuing to pursue changes.
-Public education would be a big part of this type of law change.
-The cycling community is divided over the issue.
 
Pro arguments:
-Cyclists of various levels/types all over the nation have long since adapted to yielding at stop signs successfully.
-Positive responsiveness to those using alternative transportation in our community; stop signs are more geared toward automobile issues/needs; cyclists have potential for greater view/vantage sight, sound perception than those operating from the possible obstruction of an automobile.
-Could conserve the momentum energy of cyclists if there is not traffic present; provides for what some recognize as needed considerations for a bicycle type vehicle vs. cars, trucks, buses, etc.
-Where sidewalk cycling is allowed without the requirement to stop at stop signs, the riders could be less visible to traffic than cyclists in the roadway and have less view/vantage point.
 
Con arguments:
-Perception to motorists could promote road rage/anger against cyclists; conflicts with bicyclists having all the same rights/responsibilities/duties as other vehicles. The issue could indicate a need for other type engineering options such as traffic calming (i.e. roundabouts, diverters, bike boulevards, bike routes, etc.); may send the wrong message to less experienced cyclists and cyclists who operate dangerously or with disregard to the law.
-Could focus on other bicycle priorities that are recognized from crash/fatality data or reported concerns.
-May send a message of convenience over safety.
 
The Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Board (BPAB) has confirmed their support to pursue the state law change.  The Public Safety Committee has heard both pro and con arguments and would like a gauge of state-wide input on the issue.  If a good representation of state municipalities, bicycle groups and entities show support, the issue may be brought back to the City Commission and the Public Safety Committee.
 
The Public Safety Committee discussed this item at its November 29, 2010 and January 10, 2011 meetings.  After a report from staff it was determined that nothing could be done by the City of Gainesville until the law was changed at a state-wide level.  Staff will monitor the State situation for any changes.
 
Fiscal Note
None
 
Recommendation
The City Commission remove this item from the Public Safety Committee referral list.



© 2014 City of Gainesville, Florida. All right reserved.

CONTACT US
City Departments
Online Contact
200 East University Ave.
Gainesville, FL 32601
352-334-5000