Title
Pay Study Special Job Audits (B)
Explanation
Following the announcement of the January 2004 Pay Study results, employees were allowed to appeal those results based on the following: 1) my position title is in the wrong pay grade; or 2) my position title does not reflect what I do.
Of the more than thirteen hundred (1,300) employees covered by the pay study, one hundred and sixty-six (166) filed Special Appeals. One hundred and thirty-six (136) were CWA-represented employees and thirty (30) were Managerial, Administrative and Professional (MAP) employees.
The Interest-based Bargaining Team (IBBT) closely reviewed the information on each appeal that was submitted by CWA-represented employees and the Pay Study Team reviewed the information on each appeal that was submitted by the MAP employees.
It was determined that only twenty-two (22) CWA appeals and thirteen (13) MAP appeals should be granted special job audits. Each employee was notified in writing of the disposition of his/her appeal.
The IBBT agreed that Human Resources should conduct the twenty-two (22) job audits for the CWA- represented positions. The previous City Manager determined that Dr. Felix Lopez, Industrial Psychologist, should conduct the thirteen (13) job audits on the MAP positions since the Human Resources employee conducting the CWA audits had filed a MAP appeal.
Summary of findings:
Of the twenty-two (22) CWA job audits conducted, it was determined the job duties of only nine (9) employees were not reflected in their current job descriptions and should be reclassified. In accordance with City Personnel Policies and Procedures, Policy Number 3, the reclassifications of the five (5) employees that were two pay grades or less will be handled administratively. The remaining four (4) reclassifications require approval of the Personnel & Organizational (P&O) Committee and the City Commission. The P&O Committee approved the reclassifications on May 3, 2005 and...
Click here for full text