Gainesville Logo
 
File #: 071159.    Version: Name: Evaluation of Biomass-Fueled Generation Facility Proposals (B)
Type: Discussion Item Status: Passed
File created: 5/12/2008 In control: General Manager for Utilities
On agenda: Final action: 5/12/2008
Title: Evaluation of Biomass-Fueled Generation Facility Proposals (B) Staff submits its evaluation of the binding proposals received from the three top-ranked respondents pursuant to GRU's Request for Proposals for a Biomass-Fueled Generation Facility for City Commission review.
Attachments: 1. 071159_20080428_REV.pdf, 2. 071159PPT_MOD_20080428.PDF, 3. 071159_CIT_20080512.pdf, 4. 071159_CITa_20080512.pdf, 5. 071159_CITb_20080512.pdf, 6. 071159_comm_20080512.pdf, 7. 071159_.pdf
Title
Evaluation of Biomass-Fueled Generation Facility Proposals (B)

Staff submits its evaluation of the binding proposals received from the three top-ranked respondents pursuant to GRU's Request for Proposals for a Biomass-Fueled Generation Facility for City Commission review.
Explanation
On October 15, 2008 the City Commission authorized staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to solicit biomass-fueled electrical generation. The RFP set forth a two step process, whereby the three top ranked respondents from the first step would be invited to submit binding proposals. On January 28, 2008, the Gainesville City Commission authorized staff to request binding proposals from the top three ranked respondents, allowing respondents to offer multiple proposal options. On March 24, 2008 the Commission approved the overall factors and factor weights to be applied to the evaluation of biomass proposals received pursuant to this invitation. On April 11, 2008, three firms submitted binding proposals, two of which offered two separate proposals. All proposals were for a 100% biomass fueled facility.

Proposals were evaluated and scored based on the Commission approved 14 factors and weights which reflect the environmental interests of the community, the economic benefits and risks of the project, and the reliability of the proposed power supply. The proposals were ranked in the following order:
1. Nacogdoches Power, LLC-100 MW Purchased Power Agreement (PPA)
2. Nacogdoches Power, LLC-50% of a 100 MW Unit with a PPA
3. Covanta Energy Corp.-50 MW Financed by GRU, designed, constructed, maintained and operated by Covanta
4. Covanta Energy Corp,-50 MW PPA
5. Sterling Planet-30 MW PPA

If staff is unable to negotiate an acceptable contract with the top ranked firm, staff requests authorization to initiate negotiations based on the next highest ranked proposal, in order of this ranking. Staff's review and analysis are summarized in the back up materials acc...

Click here for full text



© 2014 City of Gainesville, Florida. All right reserved.

CONTACT US
City Departments
Online Contact
200 East University Ave.
Gainesville, FL 32601
352-334-5000